Drafting a legal piece is an art with no boundary regarding its perfectness. We could say that it has become the most relevant skill in current times. A legal summation i.e. Reply to Show cause notices, Appeals, Appellate Tribunals, High courts has taken a crucial place in the changing scenario. Good legal writing provides an effective ground regarding communication and disposal of the case in the online era. Legal summation has always been an art to convince the officer regarding legal validity of the case. Today when the summations are being made online, the drafting shall be in the same manner in which the authority needs to perceive.
The foundation of legal writing is based on knowledge of writing skills, legal maxims, case laws, Act, circulars and many things which involves efficient reading, experience and skills. If the written summation is concrete then no authority can deny the favorable disposal of the case and objective is easily achieved whereas on the other hand poor summation not only denies the disposal of the case at initial level but also weakens the foundation of the case at upper level. Proper ground is very relevant to be enriched at initial summation. Majority of the professionals are facing problem with handling of litigations Time has gone when we submitted a reply according to the need of department. The drafting should be Speaking, Convincing, Exhaustive and in consonance to the act.
Litigation Monk will work specially in the field of litigation handling and GST refund assistance. Here at litigation monk we will.
We are building a specialised platform where we can manage the client litigation and refund on behalf of professionals without involving the client. We know you have a Hands-on experience- we’re here to help you giving the best service to your clients so that you can have profitable and healthy firm you’ve always desired for. It would be a professional-to-professional forum where professionals could discuss about the issue and we would assist them in the litigation and refund handling at nominal charges. Time has gone when we submitted a reply according to the need of department. Earlier either reply was made after a meeting with the officer, convincing him orally and then submitting the reply.
But gone are those days. Now we need to draft our reply in a speaking mode so that our every submission is crystal clear and included as we cannot rectify our online submissions. Still we are meeting officers but slowly and gradually it would be totally eradicated. The merit of our case will depend totally on the drafted material as how well we come up with our case before the authority via online mode. The hearing if opted would also be granted online and an unknown officer would be questioning you on the basis of grounds and facts uploaded. Here also a strong hold of law and allied case laws would be required to counter the allegation and make him believe that our case is full of merit and legal.But gone are those days. Now we need to draft our reply in a speaking mode so that our every submission is crystal clear and included as we cannot rectify our online submissions. Still we are meeting officers but slowly and gradually it would be totally eradicated. The merit of our case will depend totally on the drafted material as how well we come up with our case before the authority via online mode. The hearing if opted would also be granted online and an unknown officer would be questioning you on the basis of grounds and facts uploaded. Here also a strong hold of law and allied case laws would be required to counter the allegation and make him believe that our case is full of merit and legal.
At Litigation Monk, our purpose is to build large network with professionals & providing quality services by reducing their work pressure without disturbing your clients.
By thinking on behalf of you every day, we anticipate what you want, provide what you need and build lasting relationships. We do what it takes to help you achieve the objective.
Few years back, when we were appointed as legal advisor by the department, we came across number of drafting and pleading by the professionals. Most of the times they were good names in the town means highly reputed professionals but the standard of the reply was very compromising. The art of preparing legal document is all about thinking and composing which requires thorough knowledge of law, facts, constitutional rights, case laws, rights and duties of party. Number of check points has to be pondered upon i.e. Jurisdiction, quantification of demand, contesting each allegation, legal language, sentence formation, legal maxims etc.
Because the facts and grounds taken by the professionals were not sufficient and up to mark, maximum times the case was decided in the favour of the department.
It made us to think that there is a great vacuum in litigation handling and there is an urgent need to address this gap.